Archives are not neutral. We can’t keep everything so choices have to be made and those choices reflect the values of the people making the decisions about what to keep and what to discard. In the past people such as women, non-Europeans, Aborigines, the poor etc were not considered important contributors to our history so their stories are often not portrayed in archival records, or they were obscured in the archives by the social conventions of the time. If the archival records were taken at face value they would reveal a distorted view of the past. It is the job of historians to be alert to this distortion, to question the records and to look for the fleeting clues that indicate that there is something missing.
Women are often the subject of archival silences and diminution. I confronted this when researching for my honours thesis about the Queensland ‘Bible in State Schools’ referendum of 1910. In this article one of Brisbane’s major newspapers attributed the passing of the referendum to the role of women. Just five years previously most women in Queensland had been granted the right to vote at state polls. A statement in the Anglican Church’s newsletter, The Church Chronicle, indicated that women didn’t just vote, they immersed themselves in the campaigning work. This was an era when women were not considered important contributors to politics, yet they were being publicly acknowledged for their significant contribution by major media outlets. I wanted to know more.
I consulted the minute book of the Bible in State Schools League held by the John Oxley Library in Brisbane and discovered there was a women’s branch of the League. I found out that Bible in State Schools League was in serious financial trouble and that it was the fundraising efforts of women, through activities such as ‘coin teas‘, that rescued the organisation and enable them to wage an effective campaign in the months prior to the referendum. I found snippets about women campaigning for the passing of the referendum in newspapers of the time.
That is what I found – snippets. I had to work hard to develop a coherent understanding of the role of women in this referendum. The minute book of the all-male Bible in State Schools League executive had been placed in an archive for which I am grateful, but I did not find the minute book for the Women’s Branch. I found nothing written by women involved in the campaign. The only records of their work that have been retained are the fleeting references to their activities written by men. From the lists of female attendees at Bible in State Schools League events published in newspapers I have constructed a list of 79 women who were actively involved in the campaign – I’m sure there were many more who have not been named. Following the conventions of the time the women were generally referred to by their title and their husband’s surname, sometimes the initials of their husband’s first names were included making it difficult to ascertain whether the Mrs Campbell who attended one event was the same Mrs Campbell that hosted another. I have not found any photos of women involved in the campaign.
What is the consequence of the paucity of the archival records concerning women’s involvement in the referendum campaign? While it accurately reflects the attitudes of the time, we are at risk of over-estimating the influence and work of men in the campaign. This gives us a distorted view of how the campaign was conducted. Without developing a better understanding of the work of women in this referendum our understanding of how this referendum came to be one of only two state referendums to have ever been passed in Queensland is limited.
When individuals are not named but referred to as a group, they appear to be one amorphous whole who act in unison, never varying in opinion. I knew that some women would have been indifferent to the referendum and some women would be opposed to it passing. I wanted to include them in my thesis. Amongst the many articles published in The Brisbane Courier I found this fleeting reference to women who objected to the referendum:
It was noted that ladies connected with the Labour party were advising electors at the central booth to vote against Bible reading in the State schools.
‘Bible in State Schools: The Referendum’, The Brisbane Courier, 14/4/1910, p. 6.
I read other newspapers which opposed the passing of the referendum such as The Worker but had similar difficulties in identifying the identity of these women, what their concerns were and how they expressed these concerns.
Sometimes the archival silence defeats historians and we have to acknowledge that we cannot know. However, a lot can be done by asking the right questions and being persistent and creative. My difficulties concerned white women. The difficulties are magnified when a historian is researching non-European women living under the ‘White Australia’ policy. Tim Sherratt and Kate Bagnall have devised a creative way of reaching into the archives and highlighting these people who were living in a nation that wasn’t very keen to acknowledge or encourage their presence. Their Invisible Australians project extracts immigration records from the National Archives and displays photos of these people together with their immigration file. Bagnall comments:
Although there are many White Australia records which relate to individual women and children, they can be lost in files organised and catalogued under the names of husbands and fathers. But scroll through a wall of mostly male faces, and the women and children just leap out at you!
Kate Bagnall, Invisible Australians, 27/9/2011.
Kate Bagnall has another project called Threads of Kinship where she is developing a database of Chinese births, marriages and deaths in New South Wales prior to 1918. Through this work she wants to challenge the common belief that the Chinese community in Australia mainly consisted of men who did not live in a family unit. To carry out her task Bagnall is asking people who have copies of relevant birth, marriage and death certificates to send a copy to her so she can enter them in her database. It is great to see a historian reach out to family history researchers in this way. It is also a reminder that understanding family life in the past is important for gaining a greater understanding of how society functioned.
Yesterday was International Women’s Day. While it is vital we address the serious issues that are currently facing women around the world it is important to shine the light on the tremendous contribution that women have made in the past. Archival silences make this time-consuming and difficult but it can be done.
What is your experience with archival silences? Please share your experience in piecing together women’s history from sketchy sources.
More About Women’s History
- Women in the Records: A useful guide from State Records of New South Wales for people researching women.
- Aboriginal People: Resources for researching Aboriginal history around Australia.
- Chick History: Rebecca Price reveals the stories about women in history that are hidden in archives.
- Women’s History Carnival: This puts you in touch with some great blogging about women’s history.
- Australian Women’s History Forum incorporating Women’s History Month.
- Australian Women’s Register: This gives short biographies of many women, information about women’s organisations, useful archives, publications and more.
learnearnandreturn says
I wrote a biography of a woman – Maria Rye – and encountered these sorts of problems. She didn’t marry, so the Mrs Campbell problem didn’t arise, but because she didn’t have children, her private papers were lost or scattered. As a good mid-Victorian woman, it took her a while to publish under her own name, rather than just using initials, or anonymously. A librarian at the Fawcett Library was very helpful here in identifying ‘MSR’ – but there must be a lot of anonymous stuff I missed (I know, because there were a few items in family hands with a handwritten name on them).
Naming conventions in theory should help with the Mrs Campbell problem, Yvonne: ‘Mrs Campbell’ should be the wife of ‘Mr Campbell’ (the father, or the eldest of a number of brothers), with Mrs Robert Campbell being the wife of a younger brother. But I wouldn’t depend on the Brisbane Courier to get them right!
The Real Person!
The Real Person!
There is the possibility that there were two unrelated Mrs Campbells. You are right to be cautious about the accuracy of the Brisbane Courier on these matters. They published long lists of names of those who attended functions so it would be easy for them to get it wrong. Some corrections were published, but I am sure that some errors would have still crept through.
Aren’t librarians and archivists fantastic! Advice like you received on the initials MSR makes an enormous difference to researchers. Over the last couple of years I have learned that it is always a good idea to explain to the librarian or archivist where I am researching what my project is about. Invariably they have some useful suggestions.
Lisa Hill says
I track the gender of authors I review on my blog, but what always puts it out of synch is my fondness for reading history and politics – because so often the topics I enjoy are written by men. So I hope one day to read a book by you! Let me know when it happens:)
Lisa
The Real Person!
The Real Person!
Thankyou 🙂 I’ll let you know when I do get something in print! In the light of the I have become more conscious of the gender of the authors I read. I too have found that I read far more male historians than female. This year I am addressing this, so watch out for some book reviews of female historians on this blog.
learnearnandreturn says
Crikey had an interesting set of stats yesterday on which newspapers give most space to reviewing female authors – http://www.crikey.com.au/2012/03/09/the-data-that-shows-female-writers-dont-get-a-fair-run/
The lightweight papers seem to give more space to women’s writing – and I fear that is because they review lightweight books.
The Real Person!
The Real Person!
Hopefully initiatives such as the Australian Women Writers Challenge and the Stella Prize will help to turn these statistics around to be more representative of female writers and readers. James Tierney wrote about this issue in his blog recently. He pointed out that the issue was not just the lack of reviews of books written by female authors, there is also an imbalance in the proportion of book reviewers in our major newspapers who are female.
Thanks for the Crikey link. There is a lot of discussion about this on twitter under the #AWW2012 tag, so I tweeted this to share it with others who want to do something to address this situation. Log on to twitter and join the conversation!
Christine says
I found my women in the missionary literature and archives to begin with. Then, through newspapers and broader religious magazines, I found much, broadly, about the involvement of women in this field. Like you though I often found the women to have been marginalised, or not named. This, around the turn of the twentieth century. Interestingly conference proceedings in the children’s welfare sector of this time also reveals the involvement of women in senior and representative positions. Perhaps it led to an ethos of ‘quiet work’ behind the scenes. I am speculating here… you raise an interesting question.
The Real Person!
The Real Person!
Religious newlsetters, newspapers and magazines are an underused resource. I would love to know the circulation figures of the major ones. I suspect that they were widely read.
I agree that there seems to have been an “ethos of ‘quiet work'” on the part of women in this era. While I complain about the women being unnamed and marginalised I would imagine that some of them would have been very happy about this. It gave them the chance to develop their skills and make a difference without their work being impeded by controversy arising from the glare of publicity.
Were the women in the “senior and representative positions” in the children’s welfare sector volunteers or paid workers?
mdbrady says
What you say is true everywhere, but the more we look, and consult archivists and librarians, the more we find. Yes, it is harder to find women and there are more gaps, but we can’t justify their absense from our research because of that. I am so impressed with what you and the peolple I am finding through your blog are doing and so glad to be in touch with you all.